NBE+
Nuits Blanches
  2015-2018
an international strategic partnership
INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION  - TEACHERS' FOLDER
COORDINATION * TRAVELS * FOLLOW UP * REWRITE

    Accéder au portail public en ligne ILARGIA
Click on the moon to go to the homepage

FOLLOW UP - check point 3 - 2016, the 1st of December
(trimesters 4 and 5 : THIRD SURVEY PERIOD)
C3 Results and classroom or training activities' follow up

revenir à la page précédente
To Check Point 2
* médiatisation *

ALL THE CHECK POINTS:
CP1 * CP2 * CP3 *CP4 * CP5 * CP6 * CP 7 
 Targeted Goals Survey and Quality Control
main tool : a Googleform sent to the project holders in each country
Pedagogic Monitoring (schedule time table)                                                    

mobilities R1 * C1C2 * R2 * C3 * C4 * R3 * R4 * C5 * R5

TO SEE CP4

Click on the Wolf


Third SURVEY PERIOD
From July to November of 2016
3th Study Travel - in Cluj-Napoca  (November)



Go to : C3 report
Study Travel in Cluj-Napoca
(November, 2016)


C3 Follow up - Download from here 
C3 TARGETED GOALS
 (pdf, in French)


First progess report was done in september and can be downloaded from
the "Pedagogic Monitoring" page

You'll find on this page  :
Commented results of Check Point 3
(click on the title to find the empty questionaire)


Targeted goals during
third Survey Period
(CP3 synthesis) :

1 C3 Results evaluation

LOCAL CONTEXT STUDIES : 100 %
The first main goal for this mobility
was well targeted .
Opening ceremony and first activities during day one were very successful (it's a pity that one team was delayed because of flights' problems and could not be involved in Turda salt mine visit).

In the details, best rated activities are :  
discovery travel day, and workshops day .

LEADS FOR REWRITING : 95 %
Almost everybody considers that the short-term exchange  was great
and relevant and did permit to the involved pupils to find leads for rewritings.
The visits of  Hunyadi Castle and Deva fortress were judged as the most useful ways to process this goal (for 75% of the project holders) but the note book was also well appreciated  (20 %).

Only one people among all the project holders
thinks  a worskshop was missing
(in order to find a common synopsis).
 
Before C3, according cordination note E4 written by Mrs Zetea, we wished to apply the original plan and we did ask for every team to present her synopsis "made at home" in order to benchmark these drafts  and to choose one (or more) among the national proposals, for a future common rewriting. But this program was changed  during the preliminary brain storming phasis between teachers. That's the only reason why Romanian team  eventually did not organize the synopsis dedicated workshop.  Students have made instead a litle theatre lesson with Jean-Marc, and had to imagine a little transnational story using pictures and drawings. The final decison about the story/stories to be used  for a transnational performance  is now supposed to be taken by students in Cesme (study travel C4)...
Teachers could valid and check how relevant it is during the next transnational meeting in Riga R3.


2 Pedagogic Follow up
All teams are ready for the next stages and already made one or a few plans for rewritings.

Other datas will be inserted  in our common blog.
To Check Point 2
revenir à la page précédente
FOLLOW UP * DECEMBER, 2016
Check Point 3
 Third Survey Period

 Follow up - Check Point 4 * FEBRUARY, 2017 

 
                                                                                                                       
Understanding fears of the Past
to face the fears of our Time
 

PORTAL*STUDY TRAVELS*COORDINATIONLOCAL ACTIVITIES * BLOG NBE+  * médiatisation * SURVEY